Thursday, April 01, 2010

Was Jesus Really Crucified with the Passover Lambs?

It's rather commonplace to hear these days, both in the pulpit and on the page, that Jesus was sentenced to death at the "very hour" the Passover lambs were being offered in the Temple. Above all, Raymond Brown made this idea popular in his commentary on the Gospel of John, when he argued that John's reference to Jesus' standing before Pilate on the Pavement (Gabbatha) at "about the sixth hour" (John 19:14) was a Johannine clue meant to signal to the reader that Jesus, the true Passover lamb, was being led to the cross to take away the sins of the world. (See Brown, The Gospel according to John, 2:556).
There's only one problem with Brown's theory; he's got no evidence to back it up. In fact, the little evidence we do have contradicts his assertion. For example, Josephus, who was a priest in the Temple in the first century A.D., makes very clear that the Passover lambs were sacrificed between 3 and 5 o'clock.:
Accordingly, on the occasion of the feast called Passover, at which they sacrifice from the ninth hour [=3p.m.] to the eleventh hour [=5 p.m.], and a little fraternity, as it were, gathers around each sacrifice, of not fewer than ten persons. (Josephus, War 6:423-24)
If this is correct--and the later Mishnah backs up Josephus, saying that at the earliest, the Passover lambs would not be sacrificed until 1:30p.m. (cf. Pesahim 5:1)--then John 19:14 cannot be a signal to the reader that Pilate is sentencing Jesus to death just as the Passover lambs are beginning to be killed in the Temple. Strangely, however, this false interpretation is so widespread that I regularly encounter people now who say that John "says" Jesus was crucified at the same time as the Passover lambs. But he says no such thing.
The Perpetual Sacrifice in the Temple: 9a.m. and 3 p.m.
So, is there any cultic significance to the hour of Jesus' passion and death? Did Jesus' death on Calvary correspond to any sacrifices in the Temple?
I would suggest there is, and that it is the Synoptic evangelists who have brought this out. For while the Synoptic Gospels make it explicit that the Passover lambs were slaughtered twenty-four hours before Jesus' death (cf. Mark 14:12; Luke 22:7), there was one other sacrifice that was going on in the Temple when Jesus was crucified on Good Friday: the perpetual sacrifice, known as the Tamid.
Strangely, this sacrifice, which is forgotten by almost everyone, was arguably the most memorable of all the Jewish sacrifices, since it happened every day, twice a day. According to the Torah itself, twice a day, in the morning and the evening, an unblemished male lamb was to be sacrificed in the sanctuary, and offered along with an unbloody sacrifice of flour and wine (see Num 28:1-8; Exod 29:38-42).
Now, although the Old Testament does not say exactly when the morning and evening sacrifice took place, according to ancient Jewish sources outside the Bible, the morning offering of the Tamid took place at 9 a.m., while the evening offering took place at 3 p.m. (See Mishnah, Tamid 3:7; Josephus, Antiquities 14.4.3; Philo, Special Laws, 1:169).
The New Tamid
With that information in mind, go back to the Synoptic accounts of Jesus' death on Good Friday. Remarkably, the Gospel of Mark makes very clear that Jesus' passion and death coincided with the offerings of the perpetual sacrifice:
And it was the third hour (9a.m.), when they crucified him (Mark 15:25).
And when the sixth hour had come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour (3 p.m.). And at the ninth hour, Jesus cried with a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabacthani?" which means, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"... And Jesus uttered a loud cry, and breathed his last. (Mark 15:33-37)
Notice that Mark twice states that Jesus expired at the ninth hour, 3 o'clock. Why the emphasis? Apart from historical accuracy, what is Mark trying to communicate?
I would suggest that both chronological references are meant to tie Jesus' passion and death to the perpetual sacrifice being offered in the Temple: the bloody sacrifice of the unblemished lambs and the unbloody sacrifice of cakes and wine. In other words, Mark is showing us that Jesus is the true Tamid, the true perpetual sacrifice, who replaces the atoning power of the Temple cult. Perhaps this is why he stresses the effect of Jesus' death on the Temple:
"And Jesus uttered a loud cry and breathed his last. And the veil of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom." (Mark 15:37-38)
In short, there is no reason to strain to connect the hour of Jesus' death with the Passover lambs that had been offered Thursday afternoon. For there was another sacrificial lamb, that was directly linked to atonement, which was being offered at the very hours of his crucifixion and death.
Now, I should probably stop here. But since it's Good Friday, I'll make one last point.
What Were the Jews in the Temple Praying for when Jesus Died?
According to ancient Jewish tradition, as found in the Mishnah and Talmuds, the daily Tamid was not just about sacrifice; it was also accompanied by prayers, which Jews everywhere would say while the sacrifices were being offered in the Temple. According to these traditions, a series of blessings, commonly known as the "Eighteen Benedictions," were being said by Jews everywhere in union with the Tamid (b. Ber. 26b; Gen. R. lxviii). Remarkably, the Rabbis claim that this was taking place even during the Second Temple Period (see Babylonian Talmud, Ber.33a, Meg. 17b.)--with the exception of the benediction against the "heretics," which the Rabbis say was added by Gamaliel II at Yabneh after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70A.D. (see b. Ber. 28b).
Now, before you balk at the idea of using Talmudic traditions to reconstruct Second Temple practices, recall that the New Testament itself tells us that Jesus own followers would go up to the Temple at the hours of the perpetual sacrifice to pray. This is explicit in the book of Acts:
Now Peter and John went up to the Temple at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour (=3p.m.) (Acts 3:1; cf. 2:15).
The question is: What prayers were Jews saying while the Tamid was being sacrificed in the first century? On the one hand, we could say, 'we don't have any idea'. On the other hand, ancient Jewish tradition, provides a rather concrete answer: it tells us that the Eighteen Benedictions were being prayed at that time.
What is striking about these prayers is this: If these ancient Jewish traditions are correct--and I realize that this is disputed--then what follows below are the kind of things the Jews in the Temple would have been praying for while the Tamid was being sacrificed and while Jesus was dying on the Cross:
1. According to Jewish tradition, at 9a.m. and 3p.m., the Jews in the Temple would have been praying for redemption:
"Look upon our affliction and plead our cause,and redeem us speedily for your name's sake, for you are a mighty redeemer. Blessed are you, O Lord, the redeemer of Israel." (7th Benediction)
2. According to Jewish tradition, at 9a.m. and 3p.m., the Jews in the Temple would have been praying for the forgiveness of sins:
"Forgive us, O our Father, for we have sinned; pardon us, O our King, for we have transgressed; for you pardon and forgive. Blessed are you, O Lord, who is merciful and always ready to forgive." (6th Benediction)
3. According to Jewish tradition, at 9a.m. and 3p.m., the Jews in the Temple would have praying for the coming of the Messiah:
"Speedily cause the offspring of your servant David to flourish, and let him be exalted by your saving power, for we wait all day long for your salvation. Blessed are you, O Lord, who causes salvation to flourish." (15th Benediction)
4. In fact, according to Jewish tradition, at 9a.m. and 3p.m., the Jews in the Temple would have been praying for the resurrection of the dead:
"You, O Lord, are mighty forever, you revive the dead, you have the power to save. You sustain the living with lovingkindness, you revive the dead with great mercy, you support the falling, heal the sick, set free the bound and keep faith with those who sleep in the dust... Who resembles you, a king who puts to death and restores to life, and causes salvation to flourish? And you are certain to revive the dead. Blessed are you, O Lord, who revives the dead." (2nd Benediction)
In short, if these traditional prayers do in fact go back to the Second Temple period, then something remarkable emerges. For we find a plausible explanation for why Mark emphasizes Jesus' crucifixion and death as corresponding to the hours of 9a.m. and 3p.m.. We find that ancient Jews were praying for the very things Christians believe were dispensed by Jesus on the Cross, at the very hour he was dispensing them.

Have a blessed Triduum and a holy Easter.


31 comments:

Nathan Eubank said...

Fascinating post! Thanks.

Note the typo: the 9th hour = 3pm not 9am.

Brant Pitre said...

Thanks Nathan!
(I fixed the typo.)
Hope you have a blessed Easter, and keep in touch.

Pax.

dunhamjeremy said...

Glory to Jesus Christ-

Thank you for posting such a wonderful article!

Have a blessed Good Friday and holy Pascha.

Anonymous said...

Stupendous Post, but does this change our belief that Jesus is the Passover Lamb?

Mr. Mandala said...

One must take care before attempting to out-sleuth the supersleuth Raymond Brown, whose insight bordered on psychic awareness. Events of great power often do synchronize with the mundane, pointing out the significance of the moment. To associate the all-powerful Redemption with the common daily sacrifice in the Temple, belittles the former. As Paul was quick to grasp, this supreme sacrifice by YHVH's true High Priest, once and for all appeased the Lord God.

Josephus was not a priest, he was a socialite climbing the ladder of fame. Hardly a reputable source, yet the only one we have outside the Gospels.

The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ by the visionary Anne Catherine Emmerich agrees with Raymond's insight, synchronizing the two events. Mel Gibson had the chance to juxtapose the lambs' slayings with the Christ's but apparently missed this potentially powerful cinematic moment.

Have a great Easter yourself, just remember to be careful stepping on someone's toes that are bigger than yours.

Mr. Mandala said...

From the Dolorous Passion

"The High Priests had recommenced the sacrifice of the Paschal lamb (which had been stopped by the unexpected darkness), and they were triumphing at the return of light, when suddenly the ground beneath them trembled, the neighbouring buildings fell down, and the veil of the Temple was rent in two from the top to the bottom. Excess of terror at first rendered those on the outside speechless, but after a time they burst forth into cries and lamentations. The confusion in the interior of the Temple was not, however, as great as would naturally have been expected, because the strictest order and decorum were always enforced there, particularly with regard to the regulations to be followed by those who entered to make their sacrifice, and those who left after having offered it. The crowd was great, but the ceremonies were so solemnly carried out by the priests, that they totally engrossed the minds of the assistants. First came the immolation of the lamb, then the sprinkling of its blood, accompanied by the chanting of canticles and the sounding of trumpets. The priests were endeavouring to continue the sacrifices, when suddenly an unexpected and most appalling pause ensued; terror and astonishment were depicted on each countenance; all was thrown into confusion; not a sound was heard; the sacrifices ceased; there was a general rush to the gates of the Temple; every one endeavoured to fly as quickly as possible. And well might they fly, well might they fear and tremble; for in the midst of the multitude there suddenly appeared persons who had been dead and buried for many years! These persons looked at them sternly, and reproved them most severely for the crime they had committed that day, in bringing about the death of ‘the just man,’ and calling down his blood upon their heads. Even in the midst of this confusion, some attempts were, however, made by the priests to preserve order; they prevented those who were in the inner part of the Temple from rushing forward, pushing their way through the crowds who were in advance of them, and descending the steps which led out of the Temple: they even continued the sacrifices in some parts, and endeavoured to calm the fears of the people."

Bruce Killian said...

Brant,
Excellent insight.
From your own notes Jesus did die when the passover lambs were being slain, which is what I think most call attention to, not through the whole period. John 19:14 is 6AM He uses Roman not Jewish times. I did a nearly complete article showing how many things Jesus fulfilled of the Passover Sacrifice. Including his cross being made from a worn out Temple doorway. http://www.scripturescholar.com/JesusOurPassover.htm
grace and peace,
Bruce

T said...

Thanks, Dr. Pitre!

Have a blessed Easter!

-T. Seghers

Paul Bernacchio said...

Dr. Pitre,
Thanks for all your work. A Blessed and Happy Easter to you and your family.
Yours-In-Christ
Paul Bernacchio

Anonymous said...

I once saw Marianne Meye Thompson give a lecture at Duke where she demonstrated Brown's error and traced it forward through commentary after commentary after commentary. A thing of beauty, that lecture.

Brant Pitre said...

Anonymous--
This most certainly does NOT change the fact that Jesus is the true Passover lamb. For one thing, St. Paul explicitly states: "Christ our Passover has been sacrificed; therefore let us keep the feast" (1 Cor 5:7). Moreover, Jesus himself identifies himself as the Paschal lamb when he replaces the body and blood of the Passover Lamb with the sacrifice of his own body and blood at the Last Supper, his final Passover (Matt 26; Mark 14; Luke 22). He need not die at the exact same time as the Passover lambs when he has already identified himself with the Lamb at the LS. Remember, with every typological prefiguration there is both similarity and dissimilarity, otherwise the type would BE the reality. (I stole that from Aquinas, Summa Theologica, III.48.A.3, ad. 3).

Bruce--
Thanks for the link; I'll check it out. Although my initial reaction is to find it hard to believe that Jesus' dialogue with Pilate, the scourging at the pillar, and the demand of the crowds for Jesus to be crucified--John 18:28-John 19:13--took place BEFORE sunrise around 6am? (On this question, you should check out Summa Theologica, III.46.A.9, which deals with the timing issue and the apparent discrepancy.)

Mr. Mandala--
Thanks for the comments. Several points.
1. With all due respect, I'm not interested in Raymond Brown's shoe size, but in whether he has EVIDENCE to support his position. A good sleuth finds clues; he does not make things up. (You might be interested to know that he himself quietly backed away from this earlier theory in a footnote in his later work, The Death of the Messiah, b/c of the lack of evidence.)

2. Josephus WAS a priest, and he is NOT the "only source we have outside the Gospels." As I said above, the argument against Brown's position is supported by the Mishnah and Philo, not to mention Jubilees 49 and the Babylonian Talmud. Whether he sought to climb the social ladder is totally irrelevant; how would altering the times the Tamid was offered in the Temple in his massive history of the Jews aid him in that task? I don't follow .

3. Anne Emmerich is certainly among the Blessed, but you should take care not to confuse public revelation in Scripture with private visions. The latter must always bow to the former. (See Catechism of the Catholic Church, 67) And it is Scripture that is explicit that Jesus celebrated the Last Supper on "the first day of Unleavened Bread, when they sacrificed the Passover lamb" (Mark 14:12; Luke 22:7). In other words, if the Last Supper was eaten on the same day the Jews were sacrificing the lambs in the Temple--i.e., Thursday--then the lambs were not being sacrificed the next day, when Jesus was crucified, whatever Gibson may depict in the Passion movie. But if you want extrabiblical Catholic authorities (beyond Brown) in support of this chronology, check out the Catechism of the Council of Trent (section on Eucharist), the decrees of the Council of Trent on the Eucharist (session XXII), Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologica, III.46.A.9)--all of which assert that Jesus instituted the Eucharist on the night the Jews celebrated the Passover meal.

Therese and Paul--
Great to hear from you both!
Therese, I saw you in Church today!
Holy Triduum and Happy Easter to all.

George said...

good job on this RC friend.
for anyone who wants to see the resolution of the timing of the pesaH and Yeshu`a's timeline, see the book "Palestine calling" by Dr. W.M. Christie.
He solves the timing in the early part of the 20th century, but it's not been picked up by any theological books. The trick is to understand the two differing ways Sadducees vs Pharisees calculated the PesaH at the time.

Brandy Miller said...

Luke 23:44-46 It was now about noon and darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon because of an eclipse of the sun. Then the veil of the temple was torn down the middle. Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Father into your hands I commend my spirit"; and when he had said this he breathed his last.

Thus, Jesus died at the time the lambs were being slaughtered which has been the point of those homilies and lectures.

Anonymous said...

Jewish tradition also maintains that for 40 years before the Temple was destroyed, the sacrifices were no longer accepted.

Josh McManaway said...

What a post. Wow.

John Bergsma said...

Brant:

You should explain, then, John's timing. I've been guilty myself of repeating Brown's point, assuming that he had evidence to back it up. I also find it difficult to believe that all the passover lambs for the pilgrims to Jerusalem, which Josephus puts at a very high number, could have been sacrificed in two hours (3pm-5pm).

pax tecum,

John

Geoffrey Miller said...

"The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ by the visionary Anne Catherine Emmerich agrees with Raymond's insight, synchronizing the two events."

Yes, and I think both Fr. Raymond and Bl. Emmerich are kooks bordering on the heretical.

According to Catholic mystic Anne Catherine Emmerich, "I saw the curse pronounced by Noah upon Ham moving toward the latter like a black cloud and obscuring him. His skin lost its whiteness, he grew darker. His sin was the sin of sacrilege, the sin of one who would forcibly enter the Ark of the Covenant. I saw a most corrupt race descend from Ham and sink deeper and deeper in darkness. I see that the black, idolatrous, stupid nations are the descendants of Ham. Their color is due, not to the rays of the sun, but to the dark source whence those degraded races sprang"

According to Fr. Raymond, in a detailed 1965 article in the journal Theological Studies examining whether Jesus was ever called "God" in the New Testament, Brown concluded that "Even the fourth Gospel never portrays Jesus as saying specifically that he is God" and "there is no reason to think that Jesus was called God in the earliest layers of New Testament tradition." He argued that, "Gradually, in the development of Christian thought God was understood to be a broader term. It was seen that God had revealed so much of Himself in Jesus that God had to be able to include both Father and Son."

I'd rather not place much credence in a racist mystic or a modernist bubblehead.

Christopher said...

Peace!

Added note:

I believe this was referenced by the Holy Father back in '06. There were actually two Jewish Calendars in use at that time: The Traditional (used by the Essenes) and the New (Pharisaic/Sadducees).

The descrpency of the one day for Passover between John and the Synoptic accounts is taken by the scholarship that was unavailable to even the pre-Nicene post Essene Fathers of the Church. It was only after the Dead Sea Scroll had been translated that we knew such a thing. Pope Benedict XVI made reference to this a few summers ago in a weekly address.

Bruce Killian said...

Brant,
Thomas realized that there were two possible Passover days presented in the gospels, but he did not successfully reconcile the problem. Annie Jaubert a Catholic scholar wrote a book about 1960 (I can’t find it right now) The Date of the Last Supper that from the Dead Sea scrolls convincingly places the Last Supper on Tuesday evening the Biblically correct date by a solar year reckoning (and presented in the Synoptic Gospels) and the crucifixion on Friday by the official (proclaimed by the Chief Priests) Lunar-Solar reckoning both as Passover (given by John). The anointing in Bethany was both 2 days before the Passover Mar 14:1) and 6 days before the Passover (John 12:1). John's time for Jesus' condemnation at 6AM makes sense in the light of Matt 12:40-41 if one considers that Jesus could be considered in the tomb from that time and there was and extra day and night due to the 3 hours of darkness. So from dawn Friday to before dawn Sunday was 3 days and 3 nights. And there were literal 3 days and 3 nights from His condemnation by the Sanhedrin Thursday at dawn. It is nearly impossible to squeeze all of the trials in the allotted time because they could not leave the Seder until midnight then crossing the Kidron Valley and then 3 hours of watching. So Jesus’ arrest has to be after 3 AM.
Grace and peace,
Bruce

Moonshadow said...

Jesus, the true Passover lamb, was being led to the cross to take away the sins of the world. ... There's only one problem with Brown's theory;

Dr. Pitre, isn't the other problem that the Passover lamb doesn't atone for sin?

Anonymous said...

@ Geoffrey Miller's comment above: calling Brown a "modernist bubblehead" is quite ridiculous. I have his "Intro to NT Christology" in which he devotes several pages to a careful examination of whether the NT calls Jesus "God." He concludes that it does in several instances. You may not have understood him because he didn't speak in slogans, but don't call him a bubblehead. He's a scholar, and as the blog author notes, he did subtly retract his point in a later work. Aside from the humble Augustine, scholars don't usually shout their mistakes from the mountaintops when they realize them.

Jim Krueger said...

Thanks for confirming my skepticism of this oft-repeated remark for which I had seen no hard evidence. I've also seen/heard it said that Bethlehem supplied the lambs for Passover. Is that a pious invention as well?

Even if the hour does not precisely line up, you still must admit that John puts altogether to much emphasis on Jesus as "Lamb of God" (also "not a bone of it shall be broken") for there not to be a connection between Jesus and the slaughter of passover lambs. It's just a literary/theological connection in the Johannine style, not a chronological connection pinned down to a single moment. I doubt the slaughter of thousands of lambs would have a precise starting/ending time anyway.

Blessings on the bloggers and all readers for a joyous Easter season!

Justin said...

If the Passover was on Thursday, then wouldn't Friday have been a Passover "High Sabbath" day of rest? How would they have been able to crucify Christ on this day, since, to my understanding, it involves the same principles as the 7th day Sabbath (i.e. no work).

Tim said...

I read the Mishnah's Tamid tractates and could find no indication that the morning sacrifice occured at 9 a.m. It says it was at dawn. I will check again

De Maria said...

You said:
there was one other sacrifice that was going on in the Temple when Jesus was crucified on Good Friday: the perpetual sacrifice, known as the Tamid.
Strangely, this sacrifice, which is forgotten by almost everyone, was arguably the most memorable of all the Jewish sacrifices, since it happened every day, twice a day.


That would certainly fit in with the fact that our Christian Passover, the Mass, is a daily event.

De Maria said...

As we pray, we believe.

The revelations of Bl. Anne Emerich are not binding upon us. But the Tradition of the Catholic Church is that the Last Supper occurred on a Thursday. But Bruce says:

The Date of the Last Supper that from the Dead Sea scrolls convincingly places the Last Supper on Tuesday evening the Biblically correct date by a solar year reckoning (and presented in the Synoptic Gospels) and the crucifixion on Friday by the official (proclaimed by the Chief Priests) Lunar-Solar reckoning both as Passover (given by John).

Therefore, I find that reckoning doubtful.

According to Matt 26:
17Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?

18And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples.

19And the disciples did as Jesus had appointed them; and they made ready the passover.

20Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve.

21And as they did eat, ....

This is the same day. The day of the Last Supper.

Now, if we skip down to Matt 27, we read:
Matthew 27

1When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death:

and also:
45Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.

46And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

57When the even was come, there came a rich man of Arimathaea, named Joseph, who also himself was Jesus' disciple:

62Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,

What amount of time has elapsed between the Last Supper and Jesus death on the Cross? Not two days. Not even 24 hours according to Matthew's account. Therefore, if the Church is correct, which I firmly believe She is, the Last Supper was on Holy Thursday and Jesus was crucified on Holy Friday.

Sincerely,

De Maria

מיכאל said...

Nice work. You're aware that the "Passover" referred to in John 18:28 was not the Paschal lamb but the Chaggiga?

Your thoughts?

Unknown said...

these benedictions are amazing! lets also remember that the early church was almost entirely jewish. all the apostles were jewish. probably every writer of the new testament was jewish. and jesus is a jew. it is also easy to imagine that if jews comprise 0,2% of the world population, that they probably comprise a similar percentage, if not higher, of the world church population. plus there is still a plan for the jews that will kick in according to Rom11.

lets separate any wall that exists in our mind between jew and gentile. let us conform with Eph2:15 in the "one new man". and realise the debt that we owe the jewish people according to Rom15:27. let us repent (and change) what has led to around 1800 years of christian anti-semitism led by the catholic church.

Unknown said...

and lets not miss the obvious - that jesus did in fact give up his spirit at the hour of the sacrifice of the PASSOVER lamb: 3pm!

this also helps to remind us that it was HIM who gave Himself for us, and that neither Jews, nor Romans/Italians, nor Gentiles should get the stick for this! 1John3:16, 1Pet1:18-20, John3:16, Rom5:8, Rev1:5, John10:11,17-18, Isaiah53:4-6, Acts3:17-19, Acts4:25-28

The point of Jesus being our lamb is that God wanted to line up his message in Christ with the law and the prophets of the Old Testament / Tanach. So that everything is fulfilled and because his message is designed for the Jewish people - Acts13:26-33 – and by the Jewish people – Gen22:18 - whom he loves desperately – Matt23:37 – and STILL (how can God change?) considers to be the sensitive iris of his eye – Zech2:8. Watch out!

elderchild said...

The following scriptures confirm the day The Messiah Resurrected:

Luke 24:1,13,21 - (1) "Now upon The 1ST DAY of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the tomb, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.

(13) And, behold, two of them went THAT SAME DAY(1st Day) to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs.

(21) But we trusted that it had been He which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, TODAY IS THE THIRD DAY(which was yet the 1st Day of the week) since these things were done."

5th Day.. The Messiah crucified.......
6th Day.. The Day after The Messiah was crucified.......
7th Day.. The Second Day after The Messiah was crucified.......
1st Day.. "TODAY IS THE THIRD DAY since these things were done"!

There are many who believe that The Messiah rose again on the 7th Day, yet the above testimony confirms that The Messiah Rose Again on the 1st Day, and that the 1st Day was the third day since The Messiah was crucified.......

So when was The Messiah crucified?

The Messiah testified that he would be "in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights".

Quite simply the scriptures reveal He Arose prior to sunrise the 1st Day........

5th day/day = 1st day......... The Messiah was crucified and died.
6th day/night = 1st night....

6th day/day = 2nd day........
7th day/night = 2nd night...

7th day/day = 3rd day.........
1st day/night = 3rd night.... He Is Risen! NEW Life IS!

HalleluYAH!

The Messiah was crucified the 5th day, day, which would be Thursday, sometime after sunrise and before sunset, according to the gregorian calendar.

"Three days and three nights" just as The Messiah prophesied!

Thankfully TRUTH IS! in spite of religion.......

Simply, religion is anti-messiah!

So it is that multiplied billions have been killed and enslaved (in physical chains at times, yet mostly in the chains of strong delusion that is the commandments and doctrines of men) in the name of the god[s] of this, or that, religion!

For the fruit of death is bore of religion's way )-;
Because life is but a pawn in the wicked game they play!

And because of pagan catholicism and her harlot christian daughters "The Way of Truth is evil spoken"!

"Come out of her(babel/dis-order/babylon\world\religion), MY people"!

Seek and desire to have your portion in The Family of Our Father and GOD, "of WHOM the whole Family in Heaven and ON EARTH is named"! (Eph3:15)

And NEW "Yerusalem" which IS above IS free, and IS !NOW! the mother of us all(sons of Our Father(Abba) and GOD(Elohim)"! (Gal4:26)

Father Help! and HE does.......

De Maria said...

מיכאל said...
Nice work. You're aware that the "Passover" referred to in John 18:28 was not the Paschal lamb but the Chaggiga?

Your thoughts?
8:04 AM


I don't know to whom you addressed the question. But since I don't see an answer, I'll reply.

I don't know what is a Chaggiga. But it isn't important. Nor is it important whether the Last Supper was a Jewish Passover. What is important is that Jesus established the first Christian Passover on Holy Thursday.

Sincerely,

De Maria