tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post6358521880516073608..comments2009-10-04T12:18:26.685-07:00Comments on The Sacred Page: For Your Hardness of Heart: Understanding Jesus' T...Michael Barberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09245959720626825944noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-87725540640470505872009-10-04T12:18:26.685-07:002009-10-04T12:18:26.685-07:00Father Schnippel,
I believe the reference to the ...Father Schnippel,<br /><br />I believe the reference to the differing genders is meant to suggest that Ezekiel had the Deuteronomy legislation in mind when he wrote "the second panel."Dim Bulbhttp://thedivinelamp.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-14007375074373917212009-10-04T12:11:22.709-07:002009-10-04T12:11:22.709-07:00What a freakin' awesome post! You've really hit o...What a freakin' awesome post! You've really hit on a hermeneutical key that unlocks so much in the OT and NT!John Bergsmahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04244077072270846642noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-24517441320623203172009-10-04T12:09:25.300-07:002009-10-04T12:09:25.300-07:00You forgot to mention that the Hahn/Bergsma articl...You forgot to mention that the Hahn/Bergsma article WHAT LAWS WERE "NOT GOOD?" is available online from the St Paul Center For Biblical Theology.<br />http://www.salvationhistory.com/documents/scripture/JBL%20Ezek%2007-2004.doc.pdfDim Bulbhttp://thedivinelamp.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22792751.post-76490586212152459742009-10-04T03:55:12.520-07:002009-10-04T03:55:12.520-07:00Why is gender significant in your second to last p...Why is gender significant in your second to last paragraph?<br /><br />You clearly highlight it, but i can't find the reasoning.<br /><br />(If it is explained in the video, I can't get it to play smoothly on my computer. Alas)Father Schnippelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04731842661336037433noreply@blogger.com