Saturday, March 04, 2006

The Debate About The Canon Of Scripture

Scholar Scot McKnight has opened up the flood gates. As you all probably know, Protestants and Catholics have a different number of books in their bibles. Non-Catholics reject certain books that Catholics affirm. These disputed books are called "apocrypha" by non-Catholics and "deuterocanonical" by Catholics.

Well, three days ago McKnight decided to take a poll on his website, in which he asked readers to identify their position on the "apocrypha." Since then, he has received a whopping 58 comments. Many of the posts are very good. However, many of them also contain certain inaccuracies.

I have been following these posts closely for two reasons. First, I made the mistake of clicking the box that says "notify me by email of future comments" and have since been sent every single one posted! Secondly, and more seriously, because I have long studied the issue. I have decided to address the issues here on my blog.

For those of you awaiting the next installment of the discussion on the liturgical year, fear not. I will continue that as well. I am excited about examining Jesus' observances of Passover; the feast of Pentecost in Acts; the Day of Atonement motifs in Hebrews, etc. We will get to all that shortly.

But for all those who wonder about the historical development of the canon, here goes...

No comments: