Friday, April 09, 2010

Newsweek: Priests Unfairly Targeted as Abusers

Finally, some sanity! PLEASE, SPREAD THIS AROUND! I'm going to embolden key elements in the story and add some comments in red ink. Tip of the hat to

Mean Men: The priesthood is being cast as the refuge of pederasts. In fact, priests seem to abuse children at the same rate as everyone else.

The Catholic sex-abuse stories emerging every day suggest that Catholics have a much bigger problem with child molestation than other denominations and the general population. Many point to peculiarities of the Catholic Church (its celibacy rules for priests, its insular hierarchy, its exclusion of women) to infer that there's something particularly pernicious about Catholic clerics that predisposes them to these horrific acts. [You see, it all comes back to those peculiar Catholic customs. Forget Saint Paul and 1 Corinthians 7.] It's no wonder that, back in 2002—when the last Catholic sex-abuse scandal was making headlines—a Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll found that 64 percent of those queried thought Catholic priests "frequently'' abused children. [And so the vast majority of clergy, innocent priests--extremely good men who have sacrificed everything including having a family of their own in order to serve God by serving others--are victims of libel, and slander. They are mocked and derided. Even worse, any claim ever made against a priest--regardless of the merits--is assumed to be true.]

Yet experts say there's simply no data to support the claim at all. [Finally, a major news outlet is pointing this out! Deo gratias!] No formal comparative study has ever broken down child sexual abuse by denomination, and only the Catholic Church has released detailed data about its own. [That's right--the Catholic Church is the only religious institution that actually is attempting to be transparent!] But based on the surveys and studies conducted by different denominations over the past 30 years, experts who study child abuse say they see little reason to conclude that sexual abuse is mostly a Catholic issue. "We don't see the Catholic Church as a hotbed of this or a place that has a bigger problem than anyone else," said Ernie Allen, president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. "I can tell you without hesitation that we have seen cases in many religious settings, from traveling evangelists to mainstream ministers to rabbis and others."

Since the mid-1980s, insurance companies have offered sexual misconduct coverage as a rider on liability insurance, and their own studies indicate that Catholic churches are not higher risk than other congregations. [None of this is new information for must of us in the know. How has it taken so long for this to appear in the mainstream press?!] Insurance companies that cover all denominations, such as Guide One Center for Risk Management, which has more than 40,000 church clients, does not charge Catholic churches higher premiums. "We don't see vast difference in the incidence rate between one denomination and another," says Sarah Buckley, assistant vice president of corporate communications. "It's pretty even across the denominations." It's been that way for decades. While the company saw an uptick in these claims by all types of churches around the time of the 2002 U.S. Catholic sex-abuse scandal, Eric Spacick, Guide One's senior church-risk manager, says "it's been pretty steady since." On average, the company says 80 percent of the sexual misconduct claims they get from all denominations involve sexual abuse of children. As a result, the more children's programs a church has, the more expensive its insurance, officials at Guide One said.

The only hard data that has been made public by any denomination comes from John Jay College's study of Catholic priests, which was authorized and is being paid for by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops following the public outcry over the 2002 scandals. Limiting their study to plausible accusations made between 1950 and 1992, John Jay researchers reported that about 4 percent of the 110,000 priests active during those years had been accused of sexual misconduct involving children. Specifically, 4,392 complaints (ranging from "sexual talk" to rape) were made against priests by 10,667 victims. (Reports made after 2002, including those of incidents that occurred years earlier, are released as part of the church's annual audits.)

Experts disagree on the rate of sexual abuse among the general American male population, but Allen says a conservative estimate is one in 10. Margaret Leland Smith, a researcher at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, says her review of the numbers indicates it's closer to one in 5. But in either case, the rate of abuse by Catholic priests is not higher than these national estimates. The public also doesn't realize how "profoundly prevalent" child sexual abuse is, adds Smith. Even those numbers may be low; research suggests that only a third of abuse cases are ever reported (making it the most underreported crime). "However you slice it, it's a very common experience," Smith says.

Most child abusers have one thing in common, and it's not piety—it's preexisting relationships with their victims. That includes priests and ministers and rabbis, of course, but also family members, friends, neighbors, teachers, coaches, scout leaders, youth-group volunteers, and doctors. According to federal studies, three quarters of abuse occurs at the hands of family members or others in the victim's "circle of trust." "The fundamental premise here is that those who abuse children overwhelmingly seek out situations where they have easy and legitimate access to children," he said. "These kinds of positions offer a kind of cover for these offenders."

Priests may also appear more likely to molest children because cases of abuse come to light in huge waves. One reason is delayed reporting: less than 13 percent of victims abused between 1960 and 1980, for example, lodged a complaint in the same year as the assault. Two thirds filed their complaints after 1992, and half of those were made between 2002 and 2003 alone. "Offenders tend to be manipulative, often persuading children to believe that this is their fault," said Allen. "As a result, the children tend to keep it to themselves. There are countless victims who thought they were the only one." So what looks like high concentrations of abuse may simply reflect long and diffuse patterns of abuse that mirror those among all males.

Another reason is that the church has historically been bad at punishing (or preventing) molesters, so that many cases might come to light when just one priest is finally exposed. [Of course, this has dramatically changed so that with simply an allegation against him a priest, even without any evidence, is almost always immediately restricted.] A single predator priest with ongoing access to children might be responsible for an immense raft of abuse cases. (Marie Fortune of the Faith Trust Institute, which focuses on clerical-abuse issues, says Roman Catholics tend "to have many more schools and other programs that involve children." "Plenty of other congregations have these problems, for instance, if they have a youth ministry.") That helps explain the 200 children who were abused at a school for the deaf. It didn't happen because the school was full of rapists; it happened because one man was never stopped. Overall, the John Jay study found that 149 priests were responsible for more than 25,000 cases of abuse over the 52-year period studied.

Allen suggests a final reason we hear so much more about Catholic abuse than transgressions in other religions: its sheer size. It's the second largest single denomination in the world (behind Islam) and the biggest in the United States. (Fifty-one percent of all American adults are Protestant, but they belong to hundreds of different denominations.) "When you consider the per capita data," says Allen, "I don't think they have a larger incidence than other faiths." [Let's be clear: this isn't just his opinion--this is based on the best evidence available.]

© 2010


Now, will someone compare the rates of clergy abuse with public school teachers please? Anybody?


Anonymous said...

This article spends a little time addressing the question of public school abuse -

Jim said...

fyi, michael

Michael Barber said...


Thanks for links to that story. That is important.


Thanks so much for covering this. Innocent Catholic priests all around the world I'm sure would be very grateful.

I thought your post was especially well-written. Thanks again.

Emerson said...

My prayers and warmest affection go out to the Roman Catholic church in the midst of this unfortunate slander. I am a "separated brother", and have put up with a great deal of malice for even speaking up to defend your church. I can only imagine the trouble you must face. God help us all.

The only guilt that has been uncovered here is that of the media.

The New Testament writings are replete with warnings about the slander, gossip and hatred in store for the church from the world. Let it come. It serves as a sign for them that they will be destroyed.

Glenn said...

Priests abuse at "the same rate as everyone else"?

Really? So sexual sin of this kind is as common in the priesthood as in the unwashed population? Yes it's true that this provides balance to the way the media treats the church, but this fact actually disturbs me. I don't think that's an anti-catholic sentiment by any measure, either.

I would have hoped that the priesthood - especially in an area of sin like this - was actually better than the population at large.

Anonymous said...

Not sure if I agree with the heading that Priest abuse at the same rate as everyone else. I would agree that that there exist a similar problem, but I would argue that children are far more safer with a priest than in any other institution. I did find an article on abuse in schools which should shed a little more light.

Anonymous said...

There was a great commentary by Fr. James Martin, posted on Fr. Z's website, that stated:

"For one thing, if four percent of American priests were accused of abuse, it means that 96 percent of priests have not been accused of anything and are leading healthy, productive lives in the community. (Bluntly put: if celibacy causes abuse, why aren't the other 96 percent of priests pedophiles?) For another, 30 percent of abuse takes place within families, yet few sane people point to marriage as a cause of child abuse."

read the rest here:

John Bergsma said...

Although the article kept saying that abuse was "no more" common within the priesthood than in the population at large, the statistics they quoted consistently indicated that it was LOWER than the population at large. Why don't they point that out?